PEP's Version

After reading the chronological order of events about the controversial PEP article on the ‘gun-toting’ incident involving Richard Gutierrez, I am inclined to believe PEP has a valid point in waiting this long time before publishing it. I’m glad PEP did not succumb to the threats of the Gutierrez family – once again, Annabelle and her family’s credibility was crushed! Hurray for truth and freedom of speech … or for whatever is left of it in the Philippines.

Case in point A:
The controversial ‘gun-toting’ article per se is harmless. Had it been presented and shown to Richard’s lawyers before he filed his libel case, Richard would had been advised against setting his foot in the house of courts.

Case in point B:
Obviously, as it had been said all over the print, TV and radio medium, the Gutierrez family’s English reading comprehension is so limited to conclude ‘gun-toting’ as equivalent to ‘tinutukan’ or ‘tutukan ng baril’. And Ruffa claims to be an English-speaking gal? The word ‘toting’ came from the word ‘tote’, which means ‘to carry’ – just think of what a ‘tote bag’ means (a carry-on bag, if you don’t know what it means). Thus, ‘gun-toting’ means ‘carrying a gun’ or ‘carrier of a gun’ or ‘gun-carrier’. Simple, isn’t it?

Case in point C:
Richard said in one of his print and TV interviews that he felt like being treated like a criminal because of the article. And, if I remember right, Ruffa even claimed on print and on TV that Richard doesn’t own a gun. Hah! What a bunch of liars! Just so you know: an expired license for a gun is a criminal offence, Mr. Richard Gutierrez. It is inexcusable and idiotic to claim otherwise. Or is such idiocy allowed in the Philippines? And hey, Ruffa has the nerve to defend Richard as to owning a gun – Richard actually has three guns in his name! Yeah, wrong accusation. Bummer!

Case in point D:
I’d like to believe something did happen inside the restaurant – but no one’s willing to talk. Those involved are either afraid, or have been gagged. You can tell from their evasive answers to straight questions. They have ‘Zorrot’ to protect … too many ‘vested interests’.

Case in point E:
Everyone said to be involved in this unfortunate and controversial incident all claimed not to have seen anything, or noticed anything amiss – particularly the very people involved. There’s no mistaking they all had too much to drink, thus, they can’t remember anything. Ask Ely Quizon how much alcohol had he really consumed that night. Ask Michael Flores how drunk was he that night. I’ll bet he can’t even recall how many times he went back and forth that well observed lavatory.

Case in point F:
The ‘gun-toting’-incident did happen at the restaurant’s parking lot. When Ely Quizon was confronted with the facts on how he handled the gun in his hands, he came clean about it. But regardless of who held it or not, bottomline is the fact that Richard Gutierrez owns the gun – geez, it’s registered in his name. I’m sure he’s now thinking of how to explain these ‘misunderstandings’, or perhaps he’s likely to throw in the usual ‘blame game’ synonymous to their family nature.

Case in point G:
If Annabelle and her family have some decency left in their bones: they should fire Jun Lalin as their publicist. He is a baggage to drop as he knows not what he is doing, or what he has done, or have done. Or, was the instruction given to him is to drum up the controversial PEP article for publicity sake? Or, did the Gutierrez’ family saw an opportunity to stake in some quick cash through a ‘libel case’? Tsk, tsk, tsk … so very ill-advised.

My recommendations:
Subject all involved in a lie-detector test – that will surely be a field day! Once and for all, the general public will be entertained in identifying the big LIARS which plagued the entertainment industry.

Now, who’s going to give Richard Gutierrez Php25M for his wounded ego? Definitely, not PEP.

mga nakababaliw ng statements ni Annabelle Rama ... dakilang ina at talent manager? PWE!

Is she really out of her mind? A nutcase? A psycho case? Do tell me ...
Read transcripts below ...

http://www.pep.ph/news/20977/Annabelle-Rama-on-Wilma-Galvante:-Ang-pumatol-sa-akin,-sira-ulo!-Biro-mo,-taas-ng-posisyon-mo,-papatol-ka-sa-akin/6

http://www.pep.ph/news/20979/Annabelle-Rama-clarifies-issues-of-Heart-Evangelista-and-JC-de-Vera-with-GMA-7

They're loving it!

When times are rough, they sure need to make some splash ... just so to be in the news again. Yeah ... they're loving it.

Annabelle's B-day (click link)
She celebrated with style - with borrowed yachts from Pappi Willie Revillame and their "family lifesaver", Gov. Chavit Singson!

Richard's Arrogance (click link)
Richard's Rebuttal & Denial (click link)
The Online Verdict (click link)
The above are barrage of articles written in PEP (the comment section is of course very interesting) detailing the incident involving Richard and his display of arrogance. Well, I was not in the least surprised.

It is really a puzzle why the pinoy biz tolerate this Gutierrez clan and their appalling and blatant display of their arrogance as if they're gods to concede to.

I'd dare say that they are not a great loss to the pinoy entertainment industry. Let them vanish into thin air .... let the real fresh talent breeze in and give the biz fresh air to breathe in.

does this apply to pinoy showbiz?

How do you measure 100%?
From a strictly mathematical viewpoint, it goes like this,

What Makes 100%? What does it mean to give MORE than 100%? Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%. How about achieving 103%? What makes up 100% in life?

Here's a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:

If: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z is represented as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.

Then:

H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K

8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%

and

K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E

11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%

But,

A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E

1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%

And,

B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T

2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%

AND, look how far ass kissing will take you.

A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G

1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%

So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty that while Hard work and Knowledge will get you close, and Attitude will get you there, it's the Bullshit and Ass kissing that will put you over the top.

The insecurities of a manager-mother

this Annabelle Rama character never cease to make me double up in laughter ... she really thinks her children are that bankable, talented and the most beautiful of all of God's creation. oh, i need not tell you of the charade she started when his unico hijo didn't get as much applause as the other Bench models ... she simply couldn't understand that the public simply did not "dig" her son's "beauty" on the catwalk ... and then, here she goes again, that is if the article below is true.

http://www.philstar.com/index.php?Showbiz&p=50&type=2&sec=58&aid=20080805143

hohum ... move to the side Richard Gutierrez ... here comes the real man in Dingdong Dantes!it won't be long until there would be another charade from Annabelle Rama ranting: "It's unfair!"

say what? charity? ho-hum ...

how overwhelming! socio-civic activity instead of a birthday party for ruffa's small princesses? another publicity scoop and low gimmickry from the gutierrez clan. i've heard differently ... is it true that the gutierrez money flow is running dry?

QUOTED from PEP 30 Aug 2008: "As early as second week of July, Ruffa had already issued her invitation via text—it will be a Chinese-inspired party at the Crowne Plaza Hotel on August 23.

But just this morning, there had been a change of plans. The text message of The Buzz host read:

"In the light of the economic crisis that is sweeping the world today. I've decided to change plans for my daughters' birthdays and have a more meaningful milestone that will bless others who have less in a more special way. Therefore, Lorin and Venice will not be having a big party this year. Let's continue to pray for our country. May God bless us all." UNQUOTE.

charity? or is it simply because there's not much money in the family vault? words, word, words ... i guess the turk ex-husband, or shall i say "pretend husband", didn't send a cent for the little gals ... or did he? what say you, ruffa?

read article in full ... and do place ruffa in the pedestal the PEP way ...

http://www.pep.ph/news/18526/Ruffa-Gutierrez-favors-socio-civic-activity-over-lavish-party-on-birthdays-of-daughters

My Monster Mom ... monstrous indeed!

I heard from the grapevine that this movie the MAD-tandem's so very proud of is nothing but a monstrous eardrum wrecking experience to those who went to see it. Not even worth watching says some.

Annabelle Rama is not only an eyesore, listening to her monologue in her "palengkere" pitch would damage your precious hearing ... and Ruffa's no better - yaiks! Ruffing's acting is so annoying and TVH (trying very hard).

I wouldn't be surprised if they would claim that it made money .... what do you think?