Yeah, I sort of reacted to Ruffa's twitter account ...
Geez, no creativity there ... and her choice of tag is laughable ...
@iloveruffag = love ko si ruffa na fag?
Ha ha ha ha! Just how I interpret the tag.
Friday, 20 April 2012
On Ruffa Gutierrez' tweets about Amalia Fuentes: So very maldita!
You call this gal decent? Tweeting and bashing an 8o-yr old dame as Amalia Fuentes who has been one of the most prominent actress in the local cinema of the Philippines is so out of order and "bastos", if you ask me. Ruffa's disrespect is unforgivable. Ruffa has yet to prove herself as an actress and as a successful and respectable woman - she has yet to achieve a fourth of what Amalia has done in her tenure as queen of Philippine movies.
Ruffa, you're such a crybaby to be affected by a critique thrown your way, but when it is you and your family behaving like manics of indecency and arrogance to other people, you think it's ok?
Read and re-read what you have tweeted, Aling Ruffing. Maybe the third time you have read it, you will realise the wrong you've done.
Nadia was right in her contention: Now you know what is it like to involve your own children in such a gossip. You're now doing what every mother would do to protect her own children.
****
"Who is this old, fat, smelly woman who won't stop inventing false stories about me & my family? SHUT UP & get a life! Don't involve me!"
"Dude ur 80 yrs old. Make the most of your remaining yrs on this earth. You're own family is sick to their stomach with ur nasty attitude!"
"What's really pathetic is that her only child & grandchildren are well-loved while she's the most hated. Will pray for u nalang old woman."
Ruffa, you're such a crybaby to be affected by a critique thrown your way, but when it is you and your family behaving like manics of indecency and arrogance to other people, you think it's ok?
Read and re-read what you have tweeted, Aling Ruffing. Maybe the third time you have read it, you will realise the wrong you've done.
Nadia was right in her contention: Now you know what is it like to involve your own children in such a gossip. You're now doing what every mother would do to protect her own children.
****
"Who is this old, fat, smelly woman who won't stop inventing false stories about me & my family? SHUT UP & get a life! Don't involve me!"
"Dude ur 80 yrs old. Make the most of your remaining yrs on this earth. You're own family is sick to their stomach with ur nasty attitude!"
"What's really pathetic is that her only child & grandchildren are well-loved while she's the most hated. Will pray for u nalang old woman."
Annabelle Rama: The New Denial Queen?
Swearing to high heavens and calling on support from the Sto. Niño, Annabelles Rama has denied allegations of spreading the awful rumour. Mamatay man sya, or so she says. I'd say, ang tagal naman - now na! What do you think?
Article where Annabelle Rama denies being source of demeaning rumours spread about Nadia's daughters
http://www.pep.ph/news/33824/pep-exclusive-part-1-annabelle-rama-swears-very-demeaning-rumors-about-nadia-montenegrorsquos-daughters-did-not-come-from-her-ldquohindi-pumasok-sa-utak-ko-iyan-mamatay-manrdquo/1/1
Article where Annabelle Rama denies being source of demeaning rumours spread about Nadia's daughters
http://www.pep.ph/news/33824/pep-exclusive-part-1-annabelle-rama-swears-very-demeaning-rumors-about-nadia-montenegrorsquos-daughters-did-not-come-from-her-ldquohindi-pumasok-sa-utak-ko-iyan-mamatay-manrdquo/1/1
Libel suit against Annabelle Rama has weight in court
I was glad to read that the Philippine Court has put weight on the libel suit filed by Nadia Montenegro against the Gutierrez martiarch, Annabelle Rama. It is about time to put an end to Rama's blabbering mouth spitting ill about civil people. Out of delicadeza, Rama should shut her mouth already. Question is, does she even know what delicadeza is? Me wonders ... hmmmp!
I'm back!
Oh yes, I missed blogging about the Pinoy entertainment scene.
And guess who I've been reading on most tabloids the weeks past? You guessed it right! The holier-than-thou Gutierrez Family are hugging the headlines once more! Geez, I've never read anything positive about this family - news are always on the negative and dark side. If it's positive at all, it's definitely one paid up article to sell their image to the Fiipino public. Sell, sell sell!
And guess who I've been reading on most tabloids the weeks past? You guessed it right! The holier-than-thou Gutierrez Family are hugging the headlines once more! Geez, I've never read anything positive about this family - news are always on the negative and dark side. If it's positive at all, it's definitely one paid up article to sell their image to the Fiipino public. Sell, sell sell!
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
PEP's Version
After reading the chronological order of events about the controversial PEP article on the ‘gun-toting’ incident involving Richard Gutierrez, I am inclined to believe PEP has a valid point in waiting this long time before publishing it. I’m glad PEP did not succumb to the threats of the Gutierrez family – once again, Annabelle and her family’s credibility was crushed! Hurray for truth and freedom of speech … or for whatever is left of it in the Philippines.
Case in point A:
The controversial ‘gun-toting’ article per se is harmless. Had it been presented and shown to Richard’s lawyers before he filed his libel case, Richard would had been advised against setting his foot in the house of courts.
Case in point B:
Obviously, as it had been said all over the print, TV and radio medium, the Gutierrez family’s English reading comprehension is so limited to conclude ‘gun-toting’ as equivalent to ‘tinutukan’ or ‘tutukan ng baril’. And Ruffa claims to be an English-speaking gal? The word ‘toting’ came from the word ‘tote’, which means ‘to carry’ – just think of what a ‘tote bag’ means (a carry-on bag, if you don’t know what it means). Thus, ‘gun-toting’ means ‘carrying a gun’ or ‘carrier of a gun’ or ‘gun-carrier’. Simple, isn’t it?
Case in point C:
Richard said in one of his print and TV interviews that he felt like being treated like a criminal because of the article. And, if I remember right, Ruffa even claimed on print and on TV that Richard doesn’t own a gun. Hah! What a bunch of liars! Just so you know: an expired license for a gun is a criminal offence, Mr. Richard Gutierrez. It is inexcusable and idiotic to claim otherwise. Or is such idiocy allowed in the Philippines? And hey, Ruffa has the nerve to defend Richard as to owning a gun – Richard actually has three guns in his name! Yeah, wrong accusation. Bummer!
Case in point D:
I’d like to believe something did happen inside the restaurant – but no one’s willing to talk. Those involved are either afraid, or have been gagged. You can tell from their evasive answers to straight questions. They have ‘Zorrot’ to protect … too many ‘vested interests’.
Case in point E:
Everyone said to be involved in this unfortunate and controversial incident all claimed not to have seen anything, or noticed anything amiss – particularly the very people involved. There’s no mistaking they all had too much to drink, thus, they can’t remember anything. Ask Ely Quizon how much alcohol had he really consumed that night. Ask Michael Flores how drunk was he that night. I’ll bet he can’t even recall how many times he went back and forth that well observed lavatory.
Case in point F:
The ‘gun-toting’-incident did happen at the restaurant’s parking lot. When Ely Quizon was confronted with the facts on how he handled the gun in his hands, he came clean about it. But regardless of who held it or not, bottomline is the fact that Richard Gutierrez owns the gun – geez, it’s registered in his name. I’m sure he’s now thinking of how to explain these ‘misunderstandings’, or perhaps he’s likely to throw in the usual ‘blame game’ synonymous to their family nature.
Case in point G:
If Annabelle and her family have some decency left in their bones: they should fire Jun Lalin as their publicist. He is a baggage to drop as he knows not what he is doing, or what he has done, or have done. Or, was the instruction given to him is to drum up the controversial PEP article for publicity sake? Or, did the Gutierrez’ family saw an opportunity to stake in some quick cash through a ‘libel case’? Tsk, tsk, tsk … so very ill-advised.
My recommendations:
Subject all involved in a lie-detector test – that will surely be a field day! Once and for all, the general public will be entertained in identifying the big LIARS which plagued the entertainment industry.
Now, who’s going to give Richard Gutierrez Php25M for his wounded ego? Definitely, not PEP.
Case in point A:
The controversial ‘gun-toting’ article per se is harmless. Had it been presented and shown to Richard’s lawyers before he filed his libel case, Richard would had been advised against setting his foot in the house of courts.
Case in point B:
Obviously, as it had been said all over the print, TV and radio medium, the Gutierrez family’s English reading comprehension is so limited to conclude ‘gun-toting’ as equivalent to ‘tinutukan’ or ‘tutukan ng baril’. And Ruffa claims to be an English-speaking gal? The word ‘toting’ came from the word ‘tote’, which means ‘to carry’ – just think of what a ‘tote bag’ means (a carry-on bag, if you don’t know what it means). Thus, ‘gun-toting’ means ‘carrying a gun’ or ‘carrier of a gun’ or ‘gun-carrier’. Simple, isn’t it?
Case in point C:
Richard said in one of his print and TV interviews that he felt like being treated like a criminal because of the article. And, if I remember right, Ruffa even claimed on print and on TV that Richard doesn’t own a gun. Hah! What a bunch of liars! Just so you know: an expired license for a gun is a criminal offence, Mr. Richard Gutierrez. It is inexcusable and idiotic to claim otherwise. Or is such idiocy allowed in the Philippines? And hey, Ruffa has the nerve to defend Richard as to owning a gun – Richard actually has three guns in his name! Yeah, wrong accusation. Bummer!
Case in point D:
I’d like to believe something did happen inside the restaurant – but no one’s willing to talk. Those involved are either afraid, or have been gagged. You can tell from their evasive answers to straight questions. They have ‘Zorrot’ to protect … too many ‘vested interests’.
Case in point E:
Everyone said to be involved in this unfortunate and controversial incident all claimed not to have seen anything, or noticed anything amiss – particularly the very people involved. There’s no mistaking they all had too much to drink, thus, they can’t remember anything. Ask Ely Quizon how much alcohol had he really consumed that night. Ask Michael Flores how drunk was he that night. I’ll bet he can’t even recall how many times he went back and forth that well observed lavatory.
Case in point F:
The ‘gun-toting’-incident did happen at the restaurant’s parking lot. When Ely Quizon was confronted with the facts on how he handled the gun in his hands, he came clean about it. But regardless of who held it or not, bottomline is the fact that Richard Gutierrez owns the gun – geez, it’s registered in his name. I’m sure he’s now thinking of how to explain these ‘misunderstandings’, or perhaps he’s likely to throw in the usual ‘blame game’ synonymous to their family nature.
Case in point G:
If Annabelle and her family have some decency left in their bones: they should fire Jun Lalin as their publicist. He is a baggage to drop as he knows not what he is doing, or what he has done, or have done. Or, was the instruction given to him is to drum up the controversial PEP article for publicity sake? Or, did the Gutierrez’ family saw an opportunity to stake in some quick cash through a ‘libel case’? Tsk, tsk, tsk … so very ill-advised.
My recommendations:
Subject all involved in a lie-detector test – that will surely be a field day! Once and for all, the general public will be entertained in identifying the big LIARS which plagued the entertainment industry.
Now, who’s going to give Richard Gutierrez Php25M for his wounded ego? Definitely, not PEP.
Saturday, 28 February 2009
mga nakababaliw ng statements ni Annabelle Rama ... dakilang ina at talent manager? PWE!
Is she really out of her mind? A nutcase? A psycho case? Do tell me ...
Read transcripts below ...
http://www.pep.ph/news/20977/Annabelle-Rama-on-Wilma-Galvante:-Ang-pumatol-sa-akin,-sira-ulo!-Biro-mo,-taas-ng-posisyon-mo,-papatol-ka-sa-akin/6
http://www.pep.ph/news/20979/Annabelle-Rama-clarifies-issues-of-Heart-Evangelista-and-JC-de-Vera-with-GMA-7
Read transcripts below ...
http://www.pep.ph/news/20977/Annabelle-Rama-on-Wilma-Galvante:-Ang-pumatol-sa-akin,-sira-ulo!-Biro-mo,-taas-ng-posisyon-mo,-papatol-ka-sa-akin/6
http://www.pep.ph/news/20979/Annabelle-Rama-clarifies-issues-of-Heart-Evangelista-and-JC-de-Vera-with-GMA-7
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
