this lolit solis character ... hmmp!

i was browsing this celebrity mag online and saw an article about the libel case being thrown at lolit solis by some philippine matinee idols. i can't help laughing as i read lolit solis' counter claim of having evidence supporting what she claimed to have seen by her two eyes. geez - lolit's story smells stink all the way down here.

1) in her original article, she claimed she did not really recognise who the guys were at first. it was the so-called waiter who told her - now, that is not what i'd call an eyewitness account as she claimed it to be. when you depend on another person's account, that's "hearsay" - well, according to the law books .... unless lolit have a different book of laws.

2) lolit laments to the public why was it that she was the one being picked on about her "claim" and "namedropping" of the two matinee idols being "gay". she continued to boast that she was not the only one who said so in public and in print. geez - the case, as i understood, is a LIBEL case: meaning lolit has accused someone falsely and with malice intent. points as brought to court was that a) she falsely claimed that the two matinee idols were at the Sofitel coffeeshop; and b) she claimed with malice that it was these two whom she saw "sweet to each other as the whispered in each other's ears ..." - those, if proven untrue, are enough cause for libel, with intent and malice.

in philippines showbiz, anything and everything goes. i can only wish that evidence against this lolit solis character holds in the courts - throw her to the pack of wolves in jail where she belongs .... hmmpp!