i just read the inquirer article about the arrest of the self-exiled Jose Maria Sison in The Netherlands ... this was initiated by virtue of an arrest warrant upon the request of the Philippine Government through the Interpol (?) ... oh well, if other governments are this accommodating to the Philippines, i really wonder what the Philippines would do if charges against ruffa stepped up in other countries such as the USA and Turkey - will they turn over ruffa for prosecution in a foreign soil where she committed her "self-confessed crimes"? makes me wonder ..... well, whatever will be, will be ...
people have claimed such charges were in place ... that the authorities involved were just waiting for ruffa to make one move of mistake to make that "jump" on her ... if this is the case, is such "sison-fate" - arrest on foreign soil - likely to happen to ruffa?
Thursday, 30 August 2007
Monday, 13 August 2007
and the circus continues ...
first of all, thank you for coming to this blog site ... what an overwhelming response to the last post - wow, 410 comments to wit! they are all very interesting read, and yes, truly informative.
anyway, as you have already observed, ruffa is at it again - what a circus! what a show! and who is she kidding? or rather, who is she fooling this time around? only the lowest and dumbest sort of people in the philippines? oh, you'd come across them on PEP forums ... aplenty!
i have my own observations and thoughts about the latest development in the ruffa-yilmaz brouhaha - so, here it is ...
yilmaz' "homecoming"
ok, what made him decide to come to manila? did you have the chance to read the link below? if not, please do so ....
http://www.pep.ph/news/14398/Ruffa-Gutierrez-to-Yilmaz-Bektas:-I-love-you-and-you-have-to-change.
in this interview, yilmaz said: "She send to me a message and she told me I have to come to pick them up. Those were the magic words."
to which ruffa explained : "Well, he kept saying, ‘Come meet me here. Come meet me there.' I think it's just proper that he's the man and he should come to me in the Philippines."
(note: this reply made me think ruffa is trying to save face and justify her "message" to yilmaz)
anyone in their right mind can deduce that it was ruffa who's trying very hard to reconcile with yilmaz. her motives? i'd say she's got a number of reasons - and i'd bet two possible ones ...
1) the legit reason: her children (poor little ones to be used as pawns of their scheming mother)
2) the probable shady reason: ruffa misses the luxury of being "married" to yilmaz - regardless of where his supposed wealth comes from - and she need not work for the dough, too.
based on yilmaz' earlier pronouncements, if you are to believe them, he was ready to let go of ruffa. on the other hand, ruffa can't seem to decide whether to let go of yilmaz or keep him at bay using their children as the best excuse to keep their communication open. from what i heard, yilmaz has been calling the kids, not ruffa - but ruffa always managed to make it look like yilmaz is always calling her ... that yilmaz is after reconciliation and is keeping tab on her. well, yes, i believe he may be keeping tab on her - what she's up to all the time, the works. why? i presume that it's because one "missed step", ruffa can say goodbye to the custody of their children - yilmaz have threatened to take their children from her as soon as he has proof that ruffa is not fit as mother of his children. that's one reason why ruffa shied away from "trouble" and "showbiz gimmicks".
when ruffa subjected yilmaz to this TV interview, she has her one and only motive - to vindicate herself in public that she's telling the "truth" about her battery and abuse in the hands of yilmaz. her questions are very leading ... the turk went along even as he was put on the spot by ruffa - ruffa may be all smiles, but i'd say i have this gut feeling ... a very bad gut feeling that there's something in yilmaz that doesn't look quite right. you can tell by the way he tried to defend himself from some of ruffa's point-blank questions. also, ruffa wanted to have that public display of "how much yilmaz love her" - that everything is forgiven between them. geez, even that "nudge" towards buying a house in manila for her is a very obvious and desperate cry for financial support from yilmaz. ruffa may be overjoyed to "vindicate" herself in public when she toyed with yilmaz in that manner, but there is something "fishy" about yilmaz as he sat there with ruffa all throughout the interview. despite all that exchange of looks between them, their body language and facial expressions (especially their eyes) tells a lot more ... ruffa's smiles and light banter were obviously nervous and defensive ... it looked romantic to some, but upon closer scrutiny and observation, you'd think otherwise. the look on her face each time she address yilmaz on something seemed like she's seeking approval and confirmation of some sort from yilmaz - she looked like one who's in a fit of nervous laughs almost afraid yilmaz would say something not to her liking and is quick to justify herself.
subjects as discussed openly on national TV about resettlement in spain, reconciliation, marriage counselling, verbal expression of love and devotion to each other, "marital" woes and expectations from each other all seemed too scripted to me. i have my doubts about all these pronouncements ... my gut feeling says so.
statements from ruffa's psychologist/psychiatrist
as many have observed, and commented - how the heck can a doctor divulge what has transpired between her and her client during their sessions? yes, where is the so-called professionalism there? this quack of a doctor crossed the line of her profession's code of ethics and decency when she discussed her client on both print and TV media. or, was she told by her client to speak up and discuss their session in public? which is which? read the article below and decide for yourself ...
http://www.pep.ph/news/14403/Ruffa-Gutierrez-and-Yilmaz-Bektas-commit-to-marriage-counseling
also, commitment to marriage counselling? ruffa and yilmaz are not legally married, are they? maybe the best category to describe their so-called togetherness is as "live-in couple". until such time ruffa's divorce papers are handed down, ruffa is still Ruffa Sharmaine Gutierrez Daloia. if ruffa insists to claim she's married to Yilmaz Bektas - then it's pretty much a confirmation that she truly is a bigamist! married in the philippines ... with the whole nation as its witness - and the catholic church is not doing anything? granted they "wed" in another religion - the law applies to everyone and there should not be any exemption at all!
so, to ruffa's "quack doctor" :
- could you please treat your patient accordingly?
- could you please work on ruffa's ego and deflate it once and for all?
- could you drill some sense in your patient's empty head?
- could you give ruffa some dose of reality check?
- could you make ruffa distinguish right from wrong?
my list is quite long ... go figure!
on the prospect of living in Europe
i hope ruffa knows the consequence of doing so ... to the well-informed, this would mean a disaster for her - her "crimes" brought by her ignorance of the law is punishable in most courts in Europe ... my overworked mind it makes me wonder why yilmaz would pick Spain as "second home" - why, it's a predominantly catholic country ... they do not tolerate bigamists! hidden agenda? i hope i'm wrong ... or, am i?
yilmaz to consider living in the philippines ...
i'd say, good luck to you, yilmaz! just think - with annabelle around, how sweet a life you'd live! but i guess, you'd find ways to keep annabelle away, or maybe at a distance ... and you probably would love the make-believe world of philippine showbusiness your "wife" so adored - yup, you do belong together if you could stand all that ... public attention and adulation is what the both of you seem clamor for yourselves. go and expose your dirty linens in public to be the "talk of the town" ... enjoy life the guttierez-way ... the philippines' most talked about "wannabes" and "social climbers" ... good luck!
untl next time, folks!
anyway, as you have already observed, ruffa is at it again - what a circus! what a show! and who is she kidding? or rather, who is she fooling this time around? only the lowest and dumbest sort of people in the philippines? oh, you'd come across them on PEP forums ... aplenty!
i have my own observations and thoughts about the latest development in the ruffa-yilmaz brouhaha - so, here it is ...
yilmaz' "homecoming"
ok, what made him decide to come to manila? did you have the chance to read the link below? if not, please do so ....
http://www.pep.ph/news/14398/Ruffa-Gutierrez-to-Yilmaz-Bektas:-I-love-you-and-you-have-to-change.
in this interview, yilmaz said: "She send to me a message and she told me I have to come to pick them up. Those were the magic words."
to which ruffa explained : "Well, he kept saying, ‘Come meet me here. Come meet me there.' I think it's just proper that he's the man and he should come to me in the Philippines."
(note: this reply made me think ruffa is trying to save face and justify her "message" to yilmaz)
anyone in their right mind can deduce that it was ruffa who's trying very hard to reconcile with yilmaz. her motives? i'd say she's got a number of reasons - and i'd bet two possible ones ...
1) the legit reason: her children (poor little ones to be used as pawns of their scheming mother)
2) the probable shady reason: ruffa misses the luxury of being "married" to yilmaz - regardless of where his supposed wealth comes from - and she need not work for the dough, too.
based on yilmaz' earlier pronouncements, if you are to believe them, he was ready to let go of ruffa. on the other hand, ruffa can't seem to decide whether to let go of yilmaz or keep him at bay using their children as the best excuse to keep their communication open. from what i heard, yilmaz has been calling the kids, not ruffa - but ruffa always managed to make it look like yilmaz is always calling her ... that yilmaz is after reconciliation and is keeping tab on her. well, yes, i believe he may be keeping tab on her - what she's up to all the time, the works. why? i presume that it's because one "missed step", ruffa can say goodbye to the custody of their children - yilmaz have threatened to take their children from her as soon as he has proof that ruffa is not fit as mother of his children. that's one reason why ruffa shied away from "trouble" and "showbiz gimmicks".
when ruffa subjected yilmaz to this TV interview, she has her one and only motive - to vindicate herself in public that she's telling the "truth" about her battery and abuse in the hands of yilmaz. her questions are very leading ... the turk went along even as he was put on the spot by ruffa - ruffa may be all smiles, but i'd say i have this gut feeling ... a very bad gut feeling that there's something in yilmaz that doesn't look quite right. you can tell by the way he tried to defend himself from some of ruffa's point-blank questions. also, ruffa wanted to have that public display of "how much yilmaz love her" - that everything is forgiven between them. geez, even that "nudge" towards buying a house in manila for her is a very obvious and desperate cry for financial support from yilmaz. ruffa may be overjoyed to "vindicate" herself in public when she toyed with yilmaz in that manner, but there is something "fishy" about yilmaz as he sat there with ruffa all throughout the interview. despite all that exchange of looks between them, their body language and facial expressions (especially their eyes) tells a lot more ... ruffa's smiles and light banter were obviously nervous and defensive ... it looked romantic to some, but upon closer scrutiny and observation, you'd think otherwise. the look on her face each time she address yilmaz on something seemed like she's seeking approval and confirmation of some sort from yilmaz - she looked like one who's in a fit of nervous laughs almost afraid yilmaz would say something not to her liking and is quick to justify herself.
subjects as discussed openly on national TV about resettlement in spain, reconciliation, marriage counselling, verbal expression of love and devotion to each other, "marital" woes and expectations from each other all seemed too scripted to me. i have my doubts about all these pronouncements ... my gut feeling says so.
statements from ruffa's psychologist/psychiatrist
as many have observed, and commented - how the heck can a doctor divulge what has transpired between her and her client during their sessions? yes, where is the so-called professionalism there? this quack of a doctor crossed the line of her profession's code of ethics and decency when she discussed her client on both print and TV media. or, was she told by her client to speak up and discuss their session in public? which is which? read the article below and decide for yourself ...
http://www.pep.ph/news/14403/Ruffa-Gutierrez-and-Yilmaz-Bektas-commit-to-marriage-counseling
also, commitment to marriage counselling? ruffa and yilmaz are not legally married, are they? maybe the best category to describe their so-called togetherness is as "live-in couple". until such time ruffa's divorce papers are handed down, ruffa is still Ruffa Sharmaine Gutierrez Daloia. if ruffa insists to claim she's married to Yilmaz Bektas - then it's pretty much a confirmation that she truly is a bigamist! married in the philippines ... with the whole nation as its witness - and the catholic church is not doing anything? granted they "wed" in another religion - the law applies to everyone and there should not be any exemption at all!
so, to ruffa's "quack doctor" :
- could you please treat your patient accordingly?
- could you please work on ruffa's ego and deflate it once and for all?
- could you drill some sense in your patient's empty head?
- could you give ruffa some dose of reality check?
- could you make ruffa distinguish right from wrong?
my list is quite long ... go figure!
on the prospect of living in Europe
i hope ruffa knows the consequence of doing so ... to the well-informed, this would mean a disaster for her - her "crimes" brought by her ignorance of the law is punishable in most courts in Europe ... my overworked mind it makes me wonder why yilmaz would pick Spain as "second home" - why, it's a predominantly catholic country ... they do not tolerate bigamists! hidden agenda? i hope i'm wrong ... or, am i?
yilmaz to consider living in the philippines ...
i'd say, good luck to you, yilmaz! just think - with annabelle around, how sweet a life you'd live! but i guess, you'd find ways to keep annabelle away, or maybe at a distance ... and you probably would love the make-believe world of philippine showbusiness your "wife" so adored - yup, you do belong together if you could stand all that ... public attention and adulation is what the both of you seem clamor for yourselves. go and expose your dirty linens in public to be the "talk of the town" ... enjoy life the guttierez-way ... the philippines' most talked about "wannabes" and "social climbers" ... good luck!
untl next time, folks!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
